Does multimedia shape the limits of art and life?

Sorry I didn't really understand the part i had to summerize i did my best ..

Vannevar Bush found out the person in charge for the description quality of multimedia by planning an automatic machine. The goal was to create a machine that maintains the mind’s practice of free connection; he distinguished how ideas tend to develop in a no straight, individual way. His mission was to create a tool that could increase this characteristic of human imagination by organizing its media basics to reproduce the dynamics of the mind at play. Douglas Eneglbart also worked on Bush’s hypothesis.

Looking at the real life, any interactivity within the computer just showed a call to inspire the eyewitness to form his or her own experience of reality through electronic mediation. Janet Murray described it as “agency” which she explained “the satisfying power to take meaningful action and see the results of our decision and choices.” So this type of agency has been changed in our very narrow environment as a system for allowing the eyewitness to connect with the artist as an inspired co-worker.

Art has been known to be the mirror of life, but with all this addition of thinking and concepts of relationships and teamwork, any computer based multimedia may add to be more than a mirror of life. Multimedia already has a space between art and the real life.